In high-stakes legal environments, the integrity of a decision is measured by its resilience against retrospective scrutiny.

- When was an internal decision last subjected to external critique?
- How do you methodologically audit the plausibility of a narrative or strategy?
- Who assumes institutional responsibility when core assumptions fail to withstand adversarial testing?

We teach decision-makers to systematically identify information asymmetries in high-stakes interactions—before they become liabilities.
We bridge the gap between intuitive professional experience and documented methodological rigor.

Sar Kissati provides a specialized framework to translate forensic-derived insights into legally robust decision literacy.

Methodological Duty of Care: We support organizations in institutionalizing their duty of care through structured, peer-reviewed frameworks.

Procedural Traceability: We enhance the transparency and auditability of internal deliberative processes.

Risk Mitigation: We neutralize cognitive biases and avoidable errors in high-pressure, time-critical decision environments.

Defense of Strategy: We strengthen the defensibility of legal positions without infringing upon the professional mandate.
‍

Adversarial Preparedness: Identify structural inconsistencies during preparation—not under cross-examination.

‍Documentation Discipline: Transform professional intuition into a documented, evidence-informed audit trail.

‍Precision in High-Stakes Negotiation: Manage non-verbal output to ensure authority and poise in critical environments.

SCAnS™ (Six Channel Analysis System) is a peer-reviewed framework designed to examine the structural consistency of complex narratives.
It shifts the analytical focus from personal attributes to the structural properties of communication.

‍Multi-Channel Calibration: Systematic analysis across verbal content, style, voice, and interactional patterns.

‍Structural Consistency Markers: Training in 27 research-based markers to identify narrative ruptures and logical discontinuities.


‍The 3-2-7 Framework: A disciplined analytical framework for the structured review of case theories and internal narratives.

Uncompromising Discretion. Absolute Integrity.

‍Zero-Data-Intake: No processing, storage, or transmission of live case files or identifiable client data.

‍Synthetic Training Environments: All didactic modules utilize exclusively anonymized or synthetic scenarios.

‍Air-Gapped Infrastructure: Operational independence from client IT systems via localized, secured hardware.

‍On-Site Seclusion: All methodological work products remain within the client's physical and legal domain.

Dr. med. Otilia Gudana MSc.
‍Board-Certified Physician (DE)
MSc in Behaviour, Communication and Credibility Analysis (UK)
Certified and licensed SCAnS™ Trainer

‍_{While the trainer holds credentials in credibility analysis, this training does not involve credibility assessments of individuals. It focuses exclusively on structured narrative analysis for educational purposes.}